Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 07:52

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Have you ever had your crush reject you, and then later you all dated and married?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Popular sugar substitute erythritol may impair brain blood vessel health, study finds - PsyPost
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Xbox sale round-up June 17, 2025 - TrueAchievements
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why some allergy experts want this popular group of drugs to go away - Deseret News
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
The #1 Snack for Better Gut Health, Recommended by a Gastroenterologist - AOL.com
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
What is the craziest thing that you've ever witnessed?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.